RSS

A Public Health Approach to Preventing Maltreatment Related Child Deaths

30 Aug

By Dee Wilson

Two recent studies by Emily Putnam – Hornstein and (in one study) Barbara Needell suggest the potential of a public health approach to prevention of child abuse / neglect related fatalities. Putnam – Hornstein linked data for 4.3 million children born in California between 1999 and 2003 with Confidential Death Master Files from California’s Department of Public Health (CDPH) and CPS records from California’s statewide child welfare information database maintained by the Center for Social Services Research at the University of California at Berkeley.

“A probabilistic linkage methodology was employed to establish linkages between records in all three files,” Putnam – Hornstein states. This methodology identified 4,317,321 live births between 1999 and 2006, 596,962 children born in California between 1999 -2006 with a CPS record, 25,987 deaths which occurred before children’s fifth birthday and 1,917 child deaths of children younger than age 5 due to intentional or unintentional injuries. Approximately 14% of CPS records were not matched to a birth record, and 1.5% of death records were unmatched to a birth record. All children reported to CPS (including screened out cases) were included in the analysis. Children reported to CPS on or after the date of a fatal injury were recoded as “non – CPS” since there had been no opportunity for CPS to intervene prior to a child’s death. Multivariate models were used to control for socio-demographic variables such as child’s sex (male vs. female), child’s health (risk present vs. no risk), birth payment method (public insurance vs. private insurance), race / ethnicity (Black vs. White, Hispanic vs. White, Asian / Pacific Islanders vs. White), maternal age at birth (24 years or less vs. 25 years or older), maternal education at birth (high school degree or less vs. some college or college degree), established paternity on the birth record (missing vs. established), and birth order (later born vs. first born).

Descriptive Findings

  • Less than 1% of children reported to CPS died of injuries prior to age 5; child deaths from unintentional injuries far outnumbered deaths from intentional injuries.
  • 20.7% of children who died from injuries (intentional and unintentional) prior to age 5 had been reported to CPS prior to death; a third of children who died from intentional injuries had prior CPS reports compared to 11.9% of all children born in California from 1999- 2006.
  • Paternity was missing in almost one fifth of fatal injuries of young children and in more than one third of intentional injury deaths compared to 9.4% of the 4.3 million children born in California from 1999- 2006.
  • Almost half (49.6%) of mothers of children with fatal injuries were 24 years old or less at the deceased child’s birth; almost two thirds of mothers of children who died from intentional injuries were 24 years old or less at the deceased child’s birth compared to about one third of mothers of all children born in California from 1999-2006.
  • 72.7% of mothers of children with fatal injuries had a high school education or less; almost four fifths (79.8%) of mothers of children who died of intentional injuries had a high school education or less compared to 57.3% of mothers of all children born in California from 1999- 2006.
  • 13.2% of children who died from injuries were Black; and 21.7% of children who died from intentional injuries were Black compared to 6.1% of all children born in California from 1999- 2006. Asian Pacific Islander and Hispanic children were underrepresented among injury fatality victims. 
  • Birth payment was labeled Public for 56.3% of children who died of injuries and almost two thirds (64.2%) of children who died of intentional injuries compared to 43.5% of all children born in California from 1999- 2006.

     Multivariate Analysis – after controlling for baseline and family characteristics

  • Children who had been reported to CPS were fatally injured at a rate 2.5 times as great as unreported children.
  • Children reported to CPS died of unintentional injuries at twice the rate of unreported children.
  • Children reported to CPS died of intentional injuries at almost six times (5.86) the rate of unreported children.

 Putnam – Hornstein comments that “a prior, nonfatal allegation of maltreatment is an independent risk factor for injury death during the first 5 years of life in California,” in fact “In the fully adjusted model, an earlier (CPS) report emerged as the strongest predictor of all manners of injury death.” Putnam- Hornstein asserts that “the findings of the current study lend support to researchers… (who) have called for CPS to be pursued under a broader, public health – oriented agenda, focused on the prevention of all manners of injury..”

 How a public health approach to preventing maltreatment related injuries might work is suggested by another study recently published by Putnam – Hornstein and Needell. This study linked child welfare data to birth records for children born in California in 2002. Sixteen percent of child welfare records could not be linked to a birth record. All children reported to CPS before the age of 5 were included in the study. Twelve variables included in the birth record were selected for analysis:

  1. Child’s sex
  2. Birth weight
  3. Prenatal care
  4. Birth abnormality
  5. Maternal birth place
  6. Maternal race / ethnicity
  7. Maternal age
  8. Maternal education
  9. Abortion history
  10. Father information
  11. 11. Total children born to mother
  12. Medi-Cal status

Over half a million children (531,035) were born alive in California in 2002, and 74,182 children (13.9%) were referred to CPS due to alleged abuse or neglect before their fifth birthday.

Descriptive Findings:

Variables No CPS Report CPS Report
 Low Birth Weight  6.1%  8.6%
Prenatal Care-First Trimester 88% 76%
Teenage Mother 8% 18%
Mother Younger Than 25 30% 50%
US Born Mother 50% 70%
Paternity Not Established 7.1% 22.8%
Medi-Cal Coverage 39% 65%

Race / Ethnicity – 30% of Black Children, 34% of Native American children, 13% of White children, 14% of Hispanic children and 5% of Asian / Pacific Islander children were referred to CPS before their fifth birthday.

Multivariate Analysis – after adjusting for all other birth variables:

  • Birth to a mother who immigrated to the U.S. was a strong protective factor.
  • For children third or higher in the birth order, the risk of a CPS referral was doubled.
  • The associations between low educational achievement and CPS referral “were notably dampened for children born on Medi–Cal (i.e., poor children) and amplified for children who are not (on Medi-Cal at birth, i.e., non – poor children).”
  • Both Black and Native American children were significantly more likely than White children to have been referred to CPS by age 5, though Black children with Medi–Cal coverage at birth were less likely than Medi- Cal eligible White children to have been referred to CPS.
  • Lack of prenatal care doubled the risk of CPS referral for children not covered by Medi-Cal; children covered by Medi – Cal with no prenatal coverage were 1.5 times more likely to be referred to CPS compared to poor children whose mothers had received prenatal care.
  • A maternal history of one or more abortions was a significant risk factor for CPS referral.

These authors maintain “that objective data collected at birth can be used to identify those children in a given birth cohort who are at greatest risk of future CPS contact.” And they continue ,”if we were to utilize just a handful of risk factors for CPS contact (prenatal care that began after the first trimester, missing father information, high school degree or less for mothers, three or more children in the family, Medi-Cal coverage for U.S. born mothers) to classify as “high risk” any child born with three or more of these risk factors, we could identify 50% of children referred to CPS before the age of five from just 15% of the total birth cohort.”

It is highly likely that a public health approach will be required to significantly reduce maltreatment related deaths given (a) that only one fifth to one third of children who died of intentional or unintentional injuries in Putnam- Hornstein’s California study had been referred to CPS prior to death and (b) CPS interventions that wait for identification of immediate safety threats to young children are likely to frequently be too late to prevent serious injury or death given the physical vulnerability of babies and toddlers.

Putnam – Hornstein’s and Needell’s view is that services targeted at high risk families as identified by a handful of risk factors immediately following a child’s birth or prior to a child’s birth would be a cost effective approach to prevention at a time of diminished resources and state governments’ budget cuts. Their analysis of a California birth cohort indicates the plausibility of this approach to prevention. However, they do not propose specific services or programs or comment on the empirical support for prevention.

Studies of the Nurse Family Partnership home visitation program and Chicago Parent Child Centers, the two programs with the strongest evidence that they reduce child maltreatment, have found that much of these programs’ preventive effects on maltreatment rates were not evident until the 15 year follow up. The largely delayed effects of these programs on maltreatment rates and out- of home placements has not been adequately explained. It is both fascinating and encouraging that prevention programs that serve families for years can have a range of positive influences on family and child outcomes that extend for a couple of decades or more. Nevertheless, the question remains of what to do on behalf of high risk children beginning prior to or at birth that would protect children from all manner of injuries, including fatal injuries, during the first years of life.

What risk assessment tools do best is target families for services, but if services are ineffective, nothing much is gained by targeting families for special attention. This issue has plagued the use of risk assessment tools in child protection, and may do the same in large scale public health approaches to prevention absent bigger investments in research of promising prevention programs.

There are, however, some lessons that can be learned from past mistakes in child welfare, for example, the federal government’s premature and excessive bet on family preservation programs in the 1990s.

  • Policymakers and practitioners should not be looking for a single program or two to meet the needs of populations with diverse problems and needs. What is needed is a range of programs possibly with a number of common elements adapted to the needs of specific populations.
  • Despite their limitations and cost, there is no substitute for long term experimental and quasi- experimental studies to determine program effectiveness.
  • Programs that address co – occurring substance abuse / mental health disorders prior to a CPS referral and include persistent outreach to troubled families are urgently needed. Ditto for domestic violence interventions for both victims and batterers.
  • Allowing almost 10% of U.S. children to grow up in severely poor families (with annual incomes less than $10,000) guarantees that pervasive and intractable child neglect symptomatic of family breakdown will be an ongoing child welfare dilemma.

Policymakers and practitioners should also ponder the power of social attitudes to reduce maltreatment rates over a few decades. Arguably, the large decline in sexual abuse and physical abuse of children since the mid- 1990s has not been the result of prevention programs, but of ‘zero tolerance’ social attitudes expressed in a  variety of ways, including CPS decision making, police behavior, tort actions and intense social disapproval of these forms of child maltreatment. Once a society or community has a strong collective intent to prevent specific forms of maltreatment and/ or other early adverse experiences, the effects of prevention services and programs will be greatly enhanced.

 References

 Putnam – Hornstein, Emily, “Report of Maltreatment as a Risk Factor for Injury Death: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study,” Child Maltreatment, June 2011.

 Putnam – Hornstein, Emily, Needell, Barbara, “Predictors of Child Protective Service Contact between Birth and Age Five: An Examination of California’s 2002 Birth Cohort,” Children and Youth Services Review,” Vol. 33, issue 8, August 2011.    

 Reynolds, Arthur, “Do Early Childhood Interventions Prevent Child Maltreatment?,” Child Maltreatment, Vol. 14, No. 2, May 2009.

Advertisements
 

3 responses to “A Public Health Approach to Preventing Maltreatment Related Child Deaths

  1. Mary Ann Murphy

    August 30, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    Always that strong finding of the influence of poverty on neglect.
    There are some hopeful messages here, including the recognition of the zeal of immigrant mothers to provide a better life for their children.

     
  2. Betty Wade Coyle

    August 31, 2011 at 9:24 am

    Question – in regards to the last paragraph of this article, what studies are being referred to that indicate a “large decline in sexual abuse and physical abuse of children since the mid-1990s?”

     
  3. jaaskofish

    October 3, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    Here is Dee’s response to Betty Wade Coyle’s question above:

    David Finkelhor and Lisa Jones have published several thoughtful articles on the decline in child maltreatment. I summarized these articles and added my own interpretations in the June 2010 Sounding Board.

    Some of their best articles are:

    “Trends in Childhood Violence and Abuse Exposure,” by David Finkelhor, Heather Turner, Richard Ormrod and Shelley Hamby in Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Vol. 164, #3, March 2010.

    “Why Have Child Maltreatment and Childhood Victimization Declined,” by David Finkelhor and Lisa Jones in Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 62, #4, 2006.

    “Child Maltreatment Trends in the 1990s: Why Does Neglect Differ from Sexual and Physical Abuse?,” by Lisa Jones in Child Maltreatment, Vol. 11, #2, May 2006.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: